<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki Government (1):  Which public education problems could be better resolved through collaboration?  Which would not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catherineripley.ca/2010/07/27/wiki-government-1-which-public-education-problems-could-be-better-resolved-through-collaboration-which-would-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catherineripley.ca/2010/07/27/wiki-government-1-which-public-education-problems-could-be-better-resolved-through-collaboration-which-would-not/</link>
	<description>Edmonton Public Schools Trustee in Ward H</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://catherineripley.ca/2010/07/27/wiki-government-1-which-public-education-problems-could-be-better-resolved-through-collaboration-which-would-not/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherineripley.ca/?p=176#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Esme, thanks for your comments.  I totally agree that there is not one model or template that will work for every school district.  This is why I am hoping the new Education Act will empower school boards with more autonomy to really work with their local communities and sitautions in terms of a best governance model, best policies, etc. to suit their needs.  I missed Dr. Seel&#039;s presentation at the PSBAA Spring Assemblyl due to being out of town, but trustees who were there spoke highly of &quot;generative governance.&quot;  

  If you have time to read the next post that I just about to put up, I would appreciate your thoughts (or anybody else&#039;s) on where generative governance fits -- does it fall within collaborative democracy or deliberative democracy or is it entirely its own thing?  And perhaps, you could comment on where your experiences with Futures Visioning (did I get that right?) lies here....  Is it how your district developed the &quot;vision&quot; for public education within your community that now would help decide your board decide what challenges will be resolved through group work/deliberation?  


By the way, I encourage everyone to fill out the Inspiring Action&#039;s Transformation guide on &quot;Shared Governance, Collaboration, School Boards, and Natural Person Powers&quot; and if you can, to register to participate in the online session on this topic on August 19 in the afternoon.  http://engage.education.alberta.ca/inspiring-action/become-involved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esme, thanks for your comments.  I totally agree that there is not one model or template that will work for every school district.  This is why I am hoping the new Education Act will empower school boards with more autonomy to really work with their local communities and sitautions in terms of a best governance model, best policies, etc. to suit their needs.  I missed Dr. Seel&#8217;s presentation at the PSBAA Spring Assemblyl due to being out of town, but trustees who were there spoke highly of &#8220;generative governance.&#8221;  </p>
<p>  If you have time to read the next post that I just about to put up, I would appreciate your thoughts (or anybody else&#8217;s) on where generative governance fits &#8212; does it fall within collaborative democracy or deliberative democracy or is it entirely its own thing?  And perhaps, you could comment on where your experiences with Futures Visioning (did I get that right?) lies here&#8230;.  Is it how your district developed the &#8220;vision&#8221; for public education within your community that now would help decide your board decide what challenges will be resolved through group work/deliberation?  </p>
<p>By the way, I encourage everyone to fill out the Inspiring Action&#8217;s Transformation guide on &#8220;Shared Governance, Collaboration, School Boards, and Natural Person Powers&#8221; and if you can, to register to participate in the online session on this topic on August 19 in the afternoon.  <a href="http://engage.education.alberta.ca/inspiring-action/become-involved" rel="nofollow">http://engage.education.alberta.ca/inspiring-action/become-involved</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esmé Comfort</title>
		<link>http://catherineripley.ca/2010/07/27/wiki-government-1-which-public-education-problems-could-be-better-resolved-through-collaboration-which-would-not/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Esmé Comfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherineripley.ca/?p=176#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I am in the process of completing the Inspiring Action &quot;Transformation Guide on Shared Governance, Collaboration, School Boards and Natural Person Powers&quot;. Your blog, twitter, Facebook have all helped me as my thoughts churn about on this one. 

I think that there is not one model or template that works for each and every school district, but rather a set of best practices to be shared from which each local individuated governance emerges. Some boards are already well down this road; others have a journey ahead of them. I believe all boards can benefit from a study of Dr. Keith Seel&#039;s work on generative governance. 

My own board experience shows me that collaboration can create a sum which is greater than the individual parts but this quote: &quot;...not all problems lend themselves to problem solving by a group. An institution must be able to articulate the challenge to which the wisdom of the crowd will be applied.&quot; is exactly right.

What must also be applied is the filter or screen of the &#039;vision&#039;: is what we propose going to advance our progress? The &#039;crowd&#039; also helps provide this analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the process of completing the Inspiring Action &#8220;Transformation Guide on Shared Governance, Collaboration, School Boards and Natural Person Powers&#8221;. Your blog, twitter, Facebook have all helped me as my thoughts churn about on this one. </p>
<p>I think that there is not one model or template that works for each and every school district, but rather a set of best practices to be shared from which each local individuated governance emerges. Some boards are already well down this road; others have a journey ahead of them. I believe all boards can benefit from a study of Dr. Keith Seel&#8217;s work on generative governance. </p>
<p>My own board experience shows me that collaboration can create a sum which is greater than the individual parts but this quote: &#8220;&#8230;not all problems lend themselves to problem solving by a group. An institution must be able to articulate the challenge to which the wisdom of the crowd will be applied.&#8221; is exactly right.</p>
<p>What must also be applied is the filter or screen of the &#8216;vision&#8217;: is what we propose going to advance our progress? The &#8216;crowd&#8217; also helps provide this analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

